Biden hit back at Trump launches brutal ad answering Trump’s question

Joe Biden swiftly responded to a provocative social media post by Donald Trump, unleashing a scathing campaign advertisement. Trump had posed the question to voters, asking if they were “better off” before Biden’s tenure began. Biden’s rejoinder came in the form of a succinct video clip posted by his campaign team, titled “Donald, I’m glad you asked.”

The video, funded by the president himself, meticulously compiled snippets showcasing Trump’s handling of the COVID-19 crisis. Trump’s cavalier attitude towards the pandemic was front and center, as he minimized the severity of the situation, dismissing the staggering death toll with statements like “It is what it is” and evading accountability by proclaiming, “I don’t take responsibility at all.” Notably, the footage featured Trump’s infamous suggestion of injecting disinfectant into the human body as a purported remedy for the virus, a comment he later labeled as “sarcastic.”

Furthermore, Trump’s self-assessment of his pandemic response, rating it a flawless 10 out of 10 despite the overwhelming loss of American lives, was highlighted. This damning portrayal underscored Biden’s implicit argument that Trump’s leadership had failed the nation in its time of dire need.

The stage is now set for a rematch of the contentious 2020 election, with both candidates solidifying their positions in their respective party primaries across several states. Biden’s campaign war chest, buoyed by substantial donations, positions him to intensify his assault on Trump through strategic ad campaigns. Recent financial disclosures reveal a substantial cash advantage for Biden, with a combined total of approximately $97.5 million between his campaign and the Democratic National Committee, significantly eclipsing Trump’s available funds of $44.8 million.

As the electoral battle escalates, Biden appears poised to leverage his financial resources to amplify his critique of Trump’s presidency, framing the upcoming election as a choice between his vision for the future and the perceived failures of the past administration.